
Photo taken by Tony Thornton. Its about 15 feet from the building I work in.
No, I am not living in a refuge hovel just south of israel. My house was not washed away by the raging susquehanna river. Guard Insurance Group lives on, despite going into disaster recovery/business continuity plans. All in all, the latest disaster was a bit of a flop in the way of disasters. The people of the surrounding communities may disagree, but apparently wilkes-barre has defeated mother nature on this matter.
Lets get a few things straight.
1) Yes, the river was higher than it has ever been, including 1972. The river crested at 34.5 feet or something like that, in contrast, it normally runs at about 4-5 feet deep.
2) Yes, they evacuated wilkes-barre. Only the parts that were affected by the great flood of 72. I live on a hill, and was not evacuated.
3) The national media will say anything to get people to watch the news. Based on the national media's representation of the situation, you would have thought that our city was worse off than new orleans.
4) For everyone who thought "building the dike" was a bad idea, and a waste of money, hahahahaha to you. Both hurricane ivan in 04, and the most recent storm would have caused millions of dollars of damage without the dike. Maybe not to the level of 1972, but probably pretty close.
Chapter 78 of the tao talks about water. How water is the softest and most yielding substance, yet the best substance. It overcomes the hard and rigid because nothing can compete with it. Thus we are to be like water, we are to overcome that which stands in our way. Absorb that which confronts us. We are to be flexible and flow like water.
But what of the rock? When the water recedes, the rock remains. The rock is unyielding. It looks at the water and states, most enthusiastically "Come then, and I'll remain, go then, and yet, I remain."
Does the rock empower the water, or does the water empower the rock?
Without the rock, the water has nothing to absorb, and without the water, the rock has nothing to stand against.
Chapter 78 of the tao ends with "True sayings seem contradictory". Boy is that the truth. In the end, I believe that the answer is to be both hard and rigid, and soft and yielding. But how?
The tao is not a book of answers, its a book of questions. Questions with no answers, it is meant to provoke thought. To question itself. It proves itself by disproving itself. It proves its worth, by showing that it has none. The more I think about it, the more sense it makes, but the more sense it makes, the more senseless it becomes.