Sleep, paddle, eat.

Tacos + River = soggy tacos.

Friday, October 27, 2006

I don't even bother clicking remember me anymore.

I don't know if I'll go through with wearing my pirate costume or not. Its a really puffy shirt. I'll feel absolutely ridiculous in it...of course, it IS halloween, you're supposed to be absolutely ridiculous looking right? It don't matter, its the only costume that goes with a doo rag, and I'm always looking for a legit reason to wear a doo rag. There's only one day a year that a guy can wear a doo rag and not suck. *sigh* its not the 90's anymore.

So I read a thing by Ben Stein on my sister's blog. I figure I'll post my protest here, cause people who don't give a damn about my opinion won't bother coming here to see it, and people who do give a damn, and still don't like my opinion still like me well enough to deal with it.

Stop reading here if you're easily irritated by opposing opinions, because as a former atheist, I have a rather strong opinion on this, and it has nothing to do with belief in god, or non belief thereof.

The problem with Ben Stein's point of view is that its short-sighted and selfish. I wonder, what Mr. Stein would think about a recently sacrificed goat lying in a pentagram on the courthouse steps? Fact is, that if you are *for* placing a manger, then you must also be *for* allowing other religions to place their stuff in public places as well.

If you disagree with seeing a savagely slaughtered goat lying on your public courthouse steps, then you are a) either admitting that you are close-minded to other religions that don't fit your ideal idea of a religion, or b) soley interested in only spreading your religion to the world, and intend to use public places as a means to do that.

That being said, I have no wish to see bloody dead goat carcii lying about in the streats next to mangers, or manorahs, or meditating monks. Everybody is free to practice religion in their own home, and even in dedicated worship places in America. My question to the religious camps is, why is it so important that you display your artifacts where everyone must see them? A courthouse is neither a private place, nor is it a place of worship. Its a public building designed to accept america's wide diversity of citizens.

Should we place a yin-yang next to the 10 commandments on the wall? Should we place the satanic version of the 10 commandments next to that? If you are pressing for the right to place a manger in front of a court house, you are also pressing for the right to place a christmas tree next to it in its true form -- covered with dead rabbits and other small animals hanging from the limbs. Be careful what you wish for.

This is too often billed as an "atheist vs theist" debate, but its not that at all. Sure, it was brought to light by atheist groups who were sick of their children being forced to see religious artifacts outside of public places, but flip the coin for a second. If it were dead animals lying in front of the courthouse, it would have been the religious groups of america protesting and seeking to have it removed long before the atheists ever had a crack at it.

This argument also applies to our coins and our pledge of allegience. I wonder what the evangelicals would be saying if our coins said "In Bhudda We Trust", and our pledge of allegience contained the words "one nation over satin"? Would you still hold that we shouldn't be trying to remove religion from america's schools and governments, or would you join in the fight to have things that were counter to your point of view removed from these things? Think about it honestly for a second. In a school, where your children were forced to utter the words "one nation over satin" every single day, taking everything you worked hard to teach them and having to explain to them why their school's pledge of allegience was implying something other than what you taught them.

This is the true nature of this argument. Those that think otherwise should take a second and consider what their feelings would be if the tables were turned.

3 Comments:

  • At 5:32 AM , Blogger Shayna Willis said...

    First of all, Ben Stein doesn't mention the pledge, nor the coins, nor the cash. His argument is that churches should be able to display mangers and that people should be allowed to say Merry Christmas and we should. I don't want to have to be a closet Christians, nor should I have to be. And I'd have no problem with it if this fight were one against all religions, but it's not.

    Your argument is one of moral relativism and while I respect your point of view (as always), your thinking is flawed. Because of moral relativism, the ACLU protects groups like NAMBLA. There is a line and we have to draw it.

    Having said that, I have no problem with any group having freedom of religion. People can worship as they choose, how they choose and as publicly as they want to. That's what's great about AMerica. And I never thought in AMerica that I wouldn't be able to say Merry Christmas (which I've been asked not to do in both of my last two jobs.)

     
  • At 3:25 PM , Blogger delinx32 said...

    People are allowed to say merry christmas. You can do it all day long, you can do it in march, or april if you want. You can hide easter eggs in your purse next to a little baby jesus sitting in hay and not one person in the entire world will care.

    Nobody has ever sued to have a church remove a manger from its property, and noone ever will because THAT is freedom of religion.

    I tacked on the pledge and coins in my rant because its something I hear all the time.

    You talk about being a closet christian? Really? Lets be serious, christianity(in all its forms) now makes up 82 percent of american religions(source:http://www.adherents.com/rel_USA.html)...try telling someone your a daoist and then talk to me about having to keep your religion in a closet. Heck, most girls wont even bother to date someone who doesn't proclaim to be either christain or catholic.

    If you were asked to not say merry christmas and you weren't working for a government establishment of some sort then you have every right to sue if you were fired because of it. No company can discriminate on basis of sex, age, race, or religion.

    Here is a quote straight from the law: "An employer is required to reasonably accommodate the religious belief of an employee or prospective employee, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship." source:http://www.eeoc.gov/abouteeo/overview_practices.html

     
  • At 9:24 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    and y'all seem to have debated this one out, but i'll add my 2 cents. ben stein never said anything about religious images in/on/around public government areas...if there are those nice dedicated worship centers, they can display whatever the heck they want. dead animals pose a health risk, plastic mangers don't attract bacteria liable to spread disease with quite the virulence of a dead animal. if you want to have an alter to dead animals, great, seal it off or something. there are animal cruelty laws that prevent certain things, although, if it's a food animal, i think you can get around that. no one is FORCED to say shite in public schools, you can stand there and make up your own words to the pledge if you so desire, it is not a forced issue, it is simply something that majoratively, people do out of tradition. our coins say in God we trust for various reasons, not the least of which is that despite their variances of practice, most of our forefathers acknowledged a God of somekind. personally, jesus never said take over the government, if my coins want to have zeus on them, go ahead for all i care, money is money, you can have your damned image on it...but you can't make me worship it. i worked retail, i've had to bite my lip from saying merry christmas to 'happy holidays', i've been cussed out by bitter ass aetheist old men to the point that nice officers had to inform him there are laws against verbal abuse. and you know what? that's the way this country works. don't like christmas? don't celebrate it, don't buy shit, go protest at your nearest public area (cuz public assembly is permissible, but don't walk onto the private property of a worship center and condemn it). our judicial system closely aligns itself to the ten commandments (please, i've already heard the whole schpiel about how that's crock, if you think so, go put up hamurabi's code for all i care), so no, i don't think it's necessary to tear them off the walls of a court...however, that being said, if you're going to ban one thing, ban them all. let's not tell our school children they can't put up christmas/holiday decor on their lockers, but if you're jewish or muslim, please, by all means hang your shite every which way. all in all, your point is valid and i can agree with it, however, i think perhaps there are other lines of reasoning than mere religious superiority for the way things are done. much love as usual mprs

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home